Results  /  ToolChains

ToolChains: Comparing toolchains for hydropower scheduling in hydropower-based systems

International cooperation can provide a better understanding of how different mechanisms affect the organization of hydropower scheduling. This can be useful in the development and use of new tools and methods for short- and long-term planning of hydropower.

ToolChains: Comparing toolchains for hydropower scheduling in hydropower-based systems

International cooperation can provide a better understanding of how different mechanisms affect the organization of hydropower scheduling. This can be useful in the development and use of new tools and methods for short- and long-term planning of hydropower.

The figure shows the systems included in the study: Brazil, Norway, and the Colorado River System (yellow area) in the US.

Planning the use of resources for energy production, such as hydropower, is important to ensure efficient and secure access to electricity, both today and in the years to come. This is a complicated task, which is often influenced by many different factors. To gain a better understanding of this type of planning, researchers have in a new study compared the operational planning of hydropower systems in Norway, Brazil, and the Colorado River (CRS) in the US. They have used hydropower scheduling models that are used operationally in the three systems as a starting point.

Different countries and regions use a combination of different models to plan how their specific system can be operated optimally over both short periods and over a longer time horizon. These combinations of models and tools are referred to as toolchains and are often adapted to solve challenges for the specific regions.

The figure shows the toolchains for hydropower scheduling of the hydropower-based systems in Brazil, Norway, and the Colorado River in the US.

Focuses on the effect of market contexts

In the study, a particular emphasis is placed on how the toolchains are influenced by institutions, in this case specifically that they operate under different market contexts, with different stakeholders who have different purposes for production. This leads to the use of different planning models, and different flow in the communication between them.

The figure shows the breakdown of how short-term (STS), medium-term (MTS), and long-term (LTS) scheduling models are organized and communicate with each other in the three classified toolchains.  

As a result of the comparison, three different toolchains operational planning were classified: Centralized (Brazil), decentralized (Norway/Nordic) and multi-purpose (CRS in the US). The comparison was also used to identify several research challenges that are common to the three systems. These are described in more detail in the published article from the study. 

The study points to several similarities between the toolchains for hydropower scheduling in Norway and Brazil, despite significant differences in market conditions. The model chain for CRS in the US, on the other hand, differs from the other two, mostly because the operational planning here considers that the water has several other uses than just energy production.

Useful for the development of future methods

The classification made in the study gives a good insight into the organization of hydropower scheduling and can be useful for seeing which methods and model links are used to solve different challenges. As a result, this can make it easier to anchor further research when it comes to the development and use of new models and methods in the future.

Contact

Arild Helseth, SINTEF Energy

Birger Mo, SINTEF Energy

Project information

Project name:
Comparing toolchains for hydropower scheduling in hydropower-based systems (ToolChains)

Duration:
2022-2023

Work Package in HydroCen:
Market and services

Partners

Publications

Hydropower Scheduling Toolchains: Comparing Experiences in Brazil, Norway, and USA and Implications for Synergistic Research

Arild Helseth, Albert C. G. Melo, Quentin Ploussard, Birger Mo, Maria E. P. Maceira, Audun Botterud & Nathalie Voisin (2023)

Handbooks and tools

Newsletter from HydroCen

Contact

Arild Helseth, SINTEF Energy

Birger Mo, SINTEF Energy

Project information

Project name:
Comparing toolchains for hydropower scheduling in hydropower-based systems (ToolChains)

Duration:
2022-2023

Work Package in HydroCen:
Market and services

Partners

Publications

Hydropower Scheduling Toolchains: Comparing Experiences in Brazil, Norway, and USA and Implications for Synergistic Research

Arild Helseth, Albert C. G. Melo, Quentin Ploussard, Birger Mo, Maria E. P. Maceira, Audun Botterud & Nathalie Voisin (2023)

Handbooks and tools

Newsletter from HydroCen

|